Agency deals are earnout-heavy, working capital complex, and reps-and-warranties intensive. Understand how transactions are structured in media and marketing — and what you need to resolve before entering a process — before a buyer's advisor walks you through it on their timeline.
Run the M&A Readiness DiagnosticMedia and marketing transactions have structural characteristics that differ materially from manufacturing or SaaS M&A, and founders who enter a process without understanding these mechanics are negotiating on the buyer's terms. The most significant difference is the earnout weighting. Agency buyers underwrite relationship-dependent revenue — client billings that may or may not transfer to a new owner with the same durability — and price the uncertainty through earnout structures that defer a meaningful portion of the consideration until the buyer can confirm post-close revenue performance. Earnout periods in agency transactions typically run 18 to 36 months, with milestones tied to client retention rates, revenue growth, or EBITDA performance above a base case. The earnout percentage is directly proportional to the structural risk the buyer is underwriting: agencies with high client concentration, significant founder dependency, or predominantly project-based revenue will have a higher earnout weighting than agencies with diversified retainer revenue and an independent management team.
The deal structure conversation — stock sale versus asset purchase, earnout mechanics, working capital peg, escrow provisions, and reps and warranties insurance — requires preparation that most founders have not done before entering a process. Understanding what each provision means for your net proceeds, what you can negotiate, and where the buyer has legitimate risk that you need to address before closing is the difference between a deal that closes on your terms and a deal that closes on the buyer's. KCENAV's M&A Readiness diagnostic evaluates your transaction preparedness and identifies the specific structural issues to resolve before engaging an M&A advisor or buyer conversation.
Working capital is one of the most commonly misunderstood deal economics issues in agency transactions, and the post-close true-up is one of the most common sources of proceeds reduction that sellers do not anticipate. The working capital peg establishes the target level of net working capital — current assets minus current liabilities — that the agency will deliver to the buyer at close. If the closing working capital is below the peg, the seller writes a check. If it is above the peg, the buyer pays additional consideration. For agencies with complex working capital — large receivables from media pass-through billing, deferred revenue from prepaid retainer agreements, significant accounts payable to media vendors, and accrued compensation liabilities — the peg calculation requires detailed preparation and negotiation to reflect what is genuinely the agency's working capital versus what are client funds in transit.
Sellers who do not understand the working capital mechanics before entering a process often accept a peg that understates the seasonality, billing timing, and media pass-through dynamics of their specific business model — and then discover a post-close true-up that reduces their net proceeds by hundreds of thousands of dollars. The preparation required is straightforward: a trailing 12-month analysis of monthly working capital balances showing the high and low points of the cycle, clear documentation of what is agency-owned versus client-owned within the gross working capital balance, and an understanding of the bilateral adjustments that are standard in agency transactions. KCENAV's M&A Readiness diagnostic identifies the working capital preparation gaps specific to your business model before you enter a process where the buyer's advisor will define these mechanics for you.
Agency and media company transactions are most commonly structured as stock sales or asset purchases with upfront cash at close plus performance-based earnout payments tied to post-close revenue or EBITDA milestones. Earnouts typically run 18–36 months, with milestones tied to client retention, revenue growth, or EBITDA performance. Sellers who have addressed key-person dependency and formalized client contracts can negotiate for higher upfront cash and smaller earnout exposure because the buyer has less uncertainty to price.
Working capital normalization establishes the expected level of net working capital — current assets minus current liabilities — that the agency will deliver to the buyer at close. In agency transactions this includes accounts receivable, unbilled work in progress, deferred revenue from prepaid retainers, accounts payable to media vendors, and accrued liabilities. Media agencies with significant pass-through billing have complex gross working capital balances requiring careful normalization. A poorly negotiated working capital peg can result in a post-close true-up that significantly reduces net proceeds.
The most heavily negotiated reps and warranties in agency transactions relate to: IP ownership (all creative assets and technology are owned free and clear), client contract accuracy (agreements are in full force and assignable without consent), revenue recognition (financial statements comply with GAAP), and key employee retention. Sellers with comprehensive IP assignment agreements, formally documented client contracts, and clean financials can negotiate narrower representations and lower reps and warranties insurance premiums — reducing post-close exposure.
AI-generated content · AI Disclaimer